Prose: Jake Sittler (@jtsittler)


Some have called the Jordan XX9 the most technologically advanced Jordan shoe ever. From the spec sheet alone, they’re probably right. With a completely new woven upper, unlocked Zoom in the forefoot and Flight Plate moderator, the XX9 looks and sounds as good on paper as any shoe.

But, as we’ve seen with models like the KD VI Elite, packing a bunch of tech into one shoe doesn’t equal great on-court performance. The XX9 breaks that mold though, as Jordan Brand has unleashed a performance monster, and natural successor from the XX8.

The biggest technological innovation in the XX9 was the Flight Weave upper. Designed to provide a custom fit while retaining strength during dynamic movements and giving engineers the ability to weave fibers tighter in high wear areas, it conceptual roots lie in Flyknit and Hyperfuse systems. You’ll find a tighter weave where more support is needed and a more forgiving weave in the rest – not unlike Flyknit. But where Flyknit uppers have a tendency to leave gaps when the shoe flexes, Flight Weave is hugging the foot at all times.


Flight Weave is miles ahead of both of those textile technologies, and is one of my favorite uppers I’ve tested recently (along with the adidas’ Techfit-based Crazyquick 1 and Under Armour’s Clutchfit Drive). For comparison’s sake, it has more structure than the Crazquick 1 and fits closer to the foot with less shifting while moving around than the Clutchfit Drive upper.


You can lace the XX9 up super tight from to toebox to ankle, and the fit is impressive. The upper fully hugs the foot and lockdown is vise-like. The internal heel counter provides good heel lockdown and I did not experience any shifting anywhere on the interior.

Heel-Toe Transition
One major outsole change from the XX8 to the XX9 was the skinny bridge connecting the forefoot and heel. The XX8 was a true decoupled outsole – the heel and forefoot were independent parts – and that usually means transition isn’t as smooth. The connector on the XX9 remedies that some, but I wouldn’t consider heel-toe transition to be a strong point for the shoe. It gets better as you break it in naturally, but the large gap between heel and toe plus the slightly higher feel makes the ride less smooth than some other shoes.


For what it’s worth, I had been playing in the Clutchfits, which are as smooth as it gets, so the difference in transition may be more apparent to me than you.

The XX9 drops the heel Zoom unit and uses standard Phylon. Honestly, it probably plays a little better and more stable this way, though I thought the heel Zoom of the XX8 was just fine. You’ll get good impact protection and a consistent feel in the heel.


I was a little disappointed in the lack of responsiveness of the forefoot unlocked Zoom. It’s not bad at all, but didn’t seem as bouncy as the XX8. This is because the Zoom bags have been recessed slightly into the midsole, so as to avoid the popping issue that plagued so many pairs of the XX8. The Zoom bags have also been laid horizontally, but I didn’t quite notice the energy return that I did in the XX8.


Since the Zoom bag extends so far up the forefoot, I felt like there was a little dead zone right at the toe where the top flex point was. It wasn’t anything major, just an odd feel to go from Zoom to straight midsole at that specific flex point.

That is all a little nitpicky though, because the responsiveness is still very good. As far as court feel goes I prefer my shoes to ride a little lower to the ground, and with the Flight Plate/Zoom combo there’s a little more midsole bulk than I’m used to. The upper fits so close to the foot that it feels a little funny to have that substantial of a midsole there. Support is fantastic with the sculpted Flight Plate providing plenty of midfoot structure while still remaining flexible. Overall the cushioning setup is very good, if not great.

The outsole features anatomical sculpting in the heel and forefoot, and uses a full-lenth vertical wave pattern with some recessed horizontal sipes. The courts I typically play on are usually average to slightly above average in condition and I’ve had no traction issues. I’ll still get the familiar squeak on quick pull-ups.


I had no issues initially with the XX9. I wondered how the woven upper would hold up when getting stepped on and pushed to the limits on court, because it is softer than I had expected. But I’ve put it through several league and general pickup games, gotten stepped on, and have seen no signs of wear. The build itself is high-quality, free of glue marks or loose strands on my pair.

I expected them to hold up for months, until just yesterday when I was playing in a competitive league in central Indiana. As I unlaced after the win, I realized one of the eyelets – which are simple loops that attach to the midsole – ripped out and left me without a proper way to lace them. Back to Nike they go for a voucher.



With a price tag of $225, I was expecting the Jordan XX9 to blow me away. It’s got the lineage of 28 other shoes riding on it, and is the flagship model for the entire brand. So was I impressed? Yes – the Flight Weave upper is one of the best I’ve played in, and the shoe is great from a comfort and support standpoint.

Was I blown away? By some aspects, yes. I tweeted after my first couple of runs that I was kind of underwhelmed by the XX9 and a lot of that is tied to the lack of responsiveness underneath and average heel-toe transition. But the responsiveness is still above average and the transition improved some with multiple wearings, and I really do like playing in the shoe.

If you have the funds and are a serious hooper, it’s certainly worth a try. I feel like I have undersold it, but I feel that it really is a great shoe – one of the better shoes of the year.



34 thoughts on “Performance Review: Jordan XX9

    1. It’s painful at the register for sure. I guess I lucked out in the end with that lace loop blowing out, because I’ll get a voucher back and be able to get another pair for review – hopefully CP3 VIII. $225 will damn near get me two pairs.

  1. Hey man! Nice review. What do you think is more durable traction-wise? The translucent one or this set up in the review? Because I am really skeptical about durability especially for a 200$ + shoe.

    1. Thanks man – I guess I always prefer the solid rubber outsole, but it shouldn’t be a different compound as far as the stickiness or durability goes. I know some people think that translucent is always more slick but I can’t speak to that. I’m trying to think if I’ve hooped in a translucent outsole before, and the only one off the top of my had is the Rose 5 I’m in now. It’s partially translucent underneath but I don’t think it’s any different.

      I’d be more worried about the eyelet strap that broke loose on mine – when it ripped out of there it looked like it was basically just glued to the midsole. Super comfortable shoe and great fit, I liked hooping in it. But can you find a comparable or even better shoe at a lower price? Definitely

  2. Jake — I’ve been following your reviews for a while. Really appreciate your style and attention to detail.

    Anyway — I’m curious what size you went with on this model. I think you and I are the exact same size actually. I’m an 11-11.5 and more often opt for the 11 to get a bit closer fit. I felt like the XX9 was roomy enough that an 11 gave me a little bit closer fit.

    Again, just curious what size you reviewed. Thanks!

    1. Thanks man – great to hear.

      I need to include that in my reviews more often, but I did go with an 11. Sometimes with the woven uppers it feels like there’s more volume in there, so the 11 was good for me. I’m always right in between the 11 and 11.5 haha

    1. I went a half size down from my normal size in the xx9. I have a narrower foot and sometimes those thinner woven uppers give you more volume in there, so I went down a half size for a better fit in the toebox. Been awhile since I had kobe 8s on but I think I went true to size in em

    1. My personal preference was the Clutchfit. Both shoes locked you in like crazy but I think with the way the Clutchfit midsole and cushioning system worked with the upper, it was a more natural fit and feel on foot. I also thought the Clutchfit was better in terms of responsiveness, as it was definitely smoother and lower to the ground through each step.

  3. Am I the only one that can’t wear the new weave Nike shoes? They are incredibly slim. With an athletic sock on it felt like I had Boa constrictors on my feet. After about an hour of wearing around my home, I had to take the shoes off. Waaaaaay too tight. I like the shoe, but it just doesn’t fit me.

    1. I have a pretty narrow foot so it never really bothered me. The first couple times I laced them up I did notice some pressure but it went away pretty fast

    1. All depends on what you’re looking for in a shoe. I personally like the Clutchfit best, Micro G suits my game well and the shoe is really smooth and well cushioned. The XX9 is also good, fits really well but the cushioning is not as responsive as a $225 shoe should be – plus like I mentioned I had a lace loop rip out pretty quickly. Would be a good option if you can find them on sale, or if you’re looking for a little more midfoot support than the CFD offers. Don’t have too much time in the Soldier 8, but you kind of know what you’re getting – nice Zoom units, Fuse/mesh upper, good lockdown. Can’t comment on the fit though

    1. They’re pretty good, check the cushioning section of the review. Upper is a really nice fit, didn’t like the midsole setup quite as well as the XX8 though.

  4. Hey, out of the XX9, Clutchfit Drive, Kobe X, or Curry 1’s, which one would you recommend?? Could you order them from beast-to-least? lol

    1. I haven’t done the Kobe X yet, so I can’t speak with authority on those – but on first impression trying them on I thought the midsole was a nice combo of support and flexibility, but I didn’t feel very natural underfoot and I hated the way the upper flexed. For the other 3 I’d go 1) Curry 1 2) CFD 3) XX9. I will say all 3 are good shoes, with first two being neck and neck. All 3 had great lockdown, though I preferred the Currys height and support plus they had a very consistent feel when laced up. Also liked the slightly firmer cushioning of the Curry over the CFD, and the whole XX9 midsole was just kind of average to me – especially given the initial price. The XX9 locked down like crazy and was good everywhere, but it didn’t wow me. The Curry one fit my playing style best, was super light and supportive enough, and I loved the cushioning setup

  5. I bought these and then returned them. The flight plate at the arch dug into my low arched feet, it didn’t cause me any blisters, but do you think that was just due to the flight plate not breaking in yet? I would think that after awhile the plate should be a bit more pliable with all that weight and force you put down on the shoe. I really want to get the shoe again, any suggestions to sway me either way on the xx9 again?

    1. I don’t know if I can steer you one way or another, just because I never had that issue with the shoe. The sculpting of that plate may affect some ppl differently than others. In the review I talked about the various strengths and weaknesses but the flight plate never bothered me. I actually liked the support it provided. I don’t know if it’s wise to buy again if it bothered you before though – the XX9 was a good overall shoe and one I liked, but to me there are others better and probably cheaper

      1. They’re just on clearance now that’s the only reason I’m reconsidering the shoe. I’d have to say I’m an advocate for all jordan performance shoes as they have not let me down in any of my league or pickup games. As I’m in my 30’s now I just need shoes that have cushion and feel low to the ground. I might just bite the bullet and pick them up. Thanks for the insight.

      2. That makes a difference for sure. The SuperFly line has been good recently and CP3 always puts out a solid shoe. The worst thing for the XX9 might have been how nice the XX8 cushioning felt…the fact that it didn’t quite have the same feel was disappointing, although the Zoom bags need some realignment for functionality purposes

    2. Yeah Jake, I know what you mean. The SF2 and Sf3 have been my go to. Honestly the sf3 feels better in the cushioning department but I just really enjoy a woven upper. Not sure if you tried the brandblack j crossover 2, but thats a great shoe.

  6. Great review!👍🏽
    Just wondering if you went with the same size in the XX9s, as your Clutchfit Drives?
    (I’m ordering online, and a bit unsure about sizing..:/)

    1. Went with an 11 in the XX9, 11.5 in the CFD. I have a narrower foot so in the woven uppers I always go down a half size to reduce some of the dead space.

  7. Hey man, I have the J Wall 1 and the Kobe 9 EM both size 8.5. The J Wall 1 fits perfect on me and the Kobe 9 EM fits a little tight. Do yout think that it’s better for me go with the Jordan XX9 size 8.5 or 9? Thanks!

    1. The XX9 isn’t super narrow and the weave type upper is pretty flexible and accommodating. Should be good with an 8.5 – not many shoes are as snug as the IX EM

      1. Man, I bought the xx9 infrared and I loved. Very light and the traction is great.
        Do you think the this solid rubber will burn quickly If I play on outdoors?

      2. Not really. I didn’t try em outside but I don’t have any reason to think it would wear out that fast. I wish I hadn’t blown the lace loops on mine, I’d definitely still have em

  8. Hey, nice review! I plan on buying these sneakers but I was wondering how long were you playing in these before the eyelets became damaged

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s